This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
en:email_is_marked_as_spam [2016/07/01 11:09] – bk | en:email_is_marked_as_spam [2025/07/16 11:49] (current) – bk | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== Why is my e-mail | + | ====== Why is my email classified as spam? ====== |
- | One or more of the following factors could be increasing the e-mail’s spam score and causing it to be filtered | + | One or more of the following factors could be increasing the email’s spam score and causing it to be filtered |
- | into the spam folder: | + | |
- | + | * **Suspicious subject.** Avoid ,e.g., question- and exclamation marks, especially in combination with CAPITAL LETTERS, €-icon, $-icon | |
- | | + | * **Phishing Links.** Avoid spelling out URLs as plain text in HTML emails |
- | * **Verdächtiger Betreff.** Vermeiden Sie z.B. Frage- und Ausrufezeichen, besonders deren Kombination, | + | * **Too many emails per unit of time.** Emails with identical or similar content were sent repeatedly in a short period of time (e.g., while sending test emails). Typical spam mails are often sent frequently within a short time. For this reason, some spam filters filter out emails |
- | * **Phishing Links.** Avoid spelling out URLs as plain text in html e-mails | + | * **Unknown or suspicious |
- | * **Too many emails per unit of time.** Emails with identical or similar content were sent repeatedly in a short period of time (e.g. while sending test e-mails). Typical spam mails are often sent frequently within a short time. For this reason, some spam filters filter out e-mails | + | * **Suspicious image-to-text ratio.** The email is graphics-intensive. Whenever possible, convey your sales message in the form of text rather than images. Use more text, small images, and as few images as possible. Of course, this must be balanced against the sales goal! |
- | * **Unknown or suspicious | + | |
- | * **Suspicious image-to-text ratio.** The e-mail | + | |
- | Generally speaking, it is often difficult to reconstruct why a particular | + | Generally speaking, it is often difficult to reconstruct why a particular |
- | Frequently, the e-mail | + | Frequently, the email is marked according to personal rules that the email client in question (e.g., Outlook) has learned over time. |
+ | |||
+ | If newsletters are not delivered without returning a bounce message, there can be several reasons for this. | ||
+ | Here are some of the most common: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Spam filters intervene silently**. Use of spam filters that may discard mails directly without notifying the sender - a so-called “silent drop”. | ||
+ | * **Domain-based blocking**. If the domain used is on a blocklist or has a poor sender reputation score, it is often blocked without bounce. | ||
+ | * **User complaints**. If many recipients mark emails as //junk//, this can lead to a temporary blocking of the sender without bounces occurring. | ||
+ | * **Non-valid source code**. Sometimes the source code of a message can lead to problems with delivery. You can check whether the source code is valid, e.g. in the online validator of the W3C [[http:// | ||
<WRAP round tip 90%> | <WRAP round tip 90%> | ||
- | We recommend viewing quality control before dispatching an e-mail. Check the integrated phishing control of the links as well as the spam score and the SpamAssassin alerts. Most e-mails | + | We recommend viewing quality control before dispatching an email. Check the integrated phishing control of the links as well as the spam score and the SpamAssassin alerts. Most emails |
- | Also, the advance | + | Also, the advanced |
</ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP round tip 90%> | ||
+ | In this article you will find some suggestions on how you can optimize the deliverability of your emails: //" | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{tag> |